🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."